Post by Rule Hound on Jul 11, 2016 15:38:55 GMT
When the appropriate number of status is spent to remove someone from position (Herald/Chamberlain/Reeve/Scourge)
I am thinking of rewording the expenditure of status so that it is a direct removal of someone from that office effective immediately. And that the same person may not be renamed for a year (until just before next gather).
This would be to reflect the weight of the status used and force time for boons to come into play.
It matters now, because there is a good chance we will have a Prince by the end of next game, if it is a player then they could simply immediately re-name the same character 2 minutes latter which defeats the high cost of removing them.
I am thinking of rewording the expenditure of status so that it is a direct removal of someone from that office effective immediately. And that the same person may not be renamed for a year (until just before next gather).
This would be to reflect the weight of the status used and force time for boons to come into play.
It matters now, because there is a good chance we will have a Prince by the end of next game, if it is a player then they could simply immediately re-name the same character 2 minutes latter which defeats the high cost of removing them.